linkedin post 2016-09-23 04:13:28

Uncategorized
BROAD ONION TEST. "Importantly, the comparison is not restricted to onions versus humans. It could as easily be between pufferfish and lungfish, which differ by ∼350-fold, or members of the genus Allium, which have more than a 4-fold range in genome size that is not the result of polyploidy." http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004351 View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-09-23 04:07:46

Uncategorized
LARGE GENOMES. "Organisms that have very large genomes are not few in number or outliers—for example, of the >200 salamander genomes analyzed thus far, all are between four and 35 times larger than the human genome." http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004351 View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-09-23 04:04:59

Uncategorized
UNRELATED TO COMPLEXITY. "Genome size varies independently of intuitive notions of organism complexity or presumed number of protein-coding genes. For example, a human genome contains eight times more DNA than that of a pufferfish but is 40 times smaller than that of a lungfish." http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004351 View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-09-23 03:59:36

Uncategorized
JUNK DNA APOLOGIST AND CONTRARIANS (Alexander Palazzo, and T. Ryan Gregory, among others) make the case that most non-coding DNA has (so far) not had a function assigned to it. They raise excellent points about how little we know about their functioning. Since the majority of the genome is non-coding DNA, genome size differences are of considerable relevance. Deep dive to follow. https://lnkd.in/eT5V5Xc View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-09-23 03:53:38

Uncategorized
NON-CODING DNA, formerly "junk-DNA" continues to pose a remarkable challenge to geneticists and evolutionary scientists. On one hand, the Viral World camp with ever-expanding regulatory roles for these RNAs are eroding the old and outworn concept of functionless junk; but there are still apologists for junk DNA whose argument resides in the fact we cannot (yet) ascribe all the functions to that big non-coding chunk of genomes. A work in process. View in LinkedIn
Read More