Category: Uncategorized

GO FOR THE RIDE. “If we are faced with two alternative hypotheses, both consistent with experiment, one with great explanatory power and leading to a completely symmetric spacetime, the other asymmetric and full of philosophical problems, perhaps we can suspend our disbelief still further and see what the STH predicts.” (STH = Symmetrical Time Hypothesis). https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn

ANTIMATTER BACKWARDS IN TIME. “From now on in this essay all antiparticles are assumed for the sake of the argument to move backward in time as a matter of physical reality.” https://lnkd.in/d4BvAHFn View in LinkedIn

THE LAST STANDING. “Surely only residual Classical prejudices stand in the way of acceptance of the Feynman-Stueckelberg interpretation if this argument is correct.” https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn

BEDROCK ISSUES. “These views of the collapse of the wave function and direction of causality must be defended below, since they are necessary for the logical foundation of the STH model.” (STH = Symmetrical Time Hypothesis). https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn

CAUSALITY DIRECTION. “In either case, this is a reasonable definition of "causality", whose direction is, perhaps, that of the overwhelming majority of available superpositions, outward from the origin.” https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn

The first good snow on Mount Canigó in France seen from Girona. View in LinkedIn

THE HIDDEN LANDSCAPE. “I travelled to Haverfordwest to get to the past. From Paddington Station a Great Western locomotive took me on a journey westwards from London further and further back into geological time, from the age of mammals to the age of trilobites...Under the River Severn and into Wales, I was back before the time of the dinosaurs, to a time when Wales steamed and sweated with the humid heat of moss-laden and boggy forests in coal-swamps, where dragonflies the size of hawks flitted in the mist; and then on back still further in time, so far back that life had not yet slithered or crawled upon the land from its aqueous nursery.” (Richard A. Fortey, 1993). https://lnkd.in/gmRTQ2gq View in LinkedIn

ANTIPARTICLE REALITY. “Causality proceeds forward in time as far as the observer can see. If we can believe that each collapse of the wave function eliminates or drastically reduces the future contribution of superpositions of states of the particle which are inconsistent with the events at, say, T2 having occurred, how is this different for the antiparticle?” https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn

DETAILS OF CONJECTURE. “Consider the direction of causality in this example. At T2 when the physicist measures the particles they exist in one state of position and momentum each. Via the U-process they arrive at T3 in positions and momenta consistent with physical law and their states at T2 and so on with each measurement until Tn after which they can no longer be detected.” https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn

PARITY. “Note that the Feynman diagram for the above process is the same as for the scattering of an incident electron by a photon which has previously produced a positron and electron pair, the positron going on to annihilate the incident electron, the remaining electron from the pair proceeding onward in time.” https://lnkd.in/gDaxUYAS View in LinkedIn