linkedin post 2014-05-29 04:21:43

Uncategorized
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY ON rBGH. "The available evidence shows that the use of rBGH can cause adverse health effects in cows. The evidence for potential harm to humans is inconclusive. It is not clear that drinking milk produced using rBGH significantly increases IGF-1 levels in humans or adds to the risk of developing cancer." http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/recombinant-bovine-growth-hormone View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-05-29 04:20:38

Uncategorized
SIMILAR BUT NOT IDENTICAL. "Milk from rBST-treated cows is chemically similar to traditional milk. Both have very similar levels of protein, fat, and sugar, and comparable levels of vitamins and minerals. Milk from rBST-treated cows is not, however, chemically identical to traditional milk ...slightly elevated levels of ... BST, and Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1)." http://lnkd.in/bc36Qsd View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-06-01 05:31:53

Uncategorized
INCENTIVES FOR C-SECTION QUESTIONED. "The number of C-sections performed has grown, for example, a fourfold increase from 1971 to 1991 ... This may be accredited to the improved technology in detecting prebirth distress. Malpractice has been looked into because of the rapid increase. Some argue the higher costs of C-section births compared to regular births make physicians quicker to recommend surgery." http://lnkd.in/dUNe4MM View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-06-01 05:29:04

Uncategorized
RISE IN CAESARIAN SECTIONS. "The rate has risen to 46% in China and to levels of 25% and above in many Asian, European and Latin American countries. The rate has increased in the United States, to 33% of all births in 2012, up from 21% in 1996. Across Europe, there are differences between countries: in Italy the Caesarean section rate is 40%, while in the Nordic countries it is 14%." http://lnkd.in/dUNe4MM View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-05-29 04:17:12

Uncategorized
DIFFERING OPINIONS. The FDA, WHO, ADA, and NIH "have independently stated that dairy products and meat from BST-treated cows are safe for human consumption. A European Union report ... states that its usage often results in "severe and unnecessary pain, suffering and distress" for cows, "associated with serious mastitis, foot disorders and some reproductive problems". http://lnkd.in/bc36Qsd View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-05-31 07:08:18

Uncategorized
STRESS IN DAIRY COWS. "There is substantial evidence that fertility of the modern dairy cow is getting lower with increasing milk yields. Our inability to appropriately feed and house high-yielding cows is leading to increased stress and thus a failure to meet genetic potential for yield and fertility." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2854809/ View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-05-29 04:15:39

Uncategorized
SHORT DURATION BEFORE WITHDRAWAL. rBGH (rBST) was approved for Monsanto for commercial use by the FDA (in 1993), and in other countries, but "rBST has not been allowed on the market in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel or the European Union since 2000. Part of the heated controversy was around labeling. http://lnkd.in/bc36Qsd View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2014-05-31 07:06:20

Uncategorized
ESTROUS MANIPULATION followed by artificial insemination in the majority of food animals is a highly artificial state designed for farming efficiency. Despite having created a situation far from that in nature, there is a silence in the literature regarding any negatives about this practice, excepting stress and diminished fertility. View in LinkedIn
Read More