linkedin post 2020-03-12 06:04:17

Uncategorized
MIRROR MIRROR ON THE WALL. "We are then, testing the machine’s ‘intelligence’ via the ‘computer’s’ ability to fool our ‘intelligence’ within a particular context. Put yet another way, if we are not intelligent enough to solve the riddle, then we will call the machine intelligent (like us?)." (The Turing Test). http://www.abelard.org/turing/tur-hi.php#2 View in LinkedIn
Read More
linkedin post 2020-03-12 06:06:29

linkedin post 2020-03-12 06:06:29

Uncategorized
REVERSE TURING TEST. "Consider for the moment a reverse question: can a machine tell us (any of us) apart from another machine? If a machine cannot make such a distinction, are we still to call the machine intelligent? Or if it cannot, should we move to withhold the accolade?" http://www.abelard.org/turing/tur-hi.php#2 View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:16:22

Uncategorized
THE IMITATION GAME. "I believe that in about fifty years time it will be possible to programme computers with a storage capacity of about 10(9) to make them play the imitation game so well that an average interrogator will not have more than 70 per cent chance of making the right identification after five minutes of questioning." (A.M. Turing, 1950). http://www.abelard.org/turpap/turpap.php View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:20:20

Uncategorized
THINKING MACHINES. "I believe that at the end of the century the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that one will be able to speak of machines thinking without expecting to be contradicted." (A.M. Turing, 1950). http://www.abelard.org/turpap/turpap.php View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:21:29

Uncategorized
UNPROVEN CONJECTURE. "The popular view that scientists proceed inexorably from well-established fact to well-established fact, never being influenced by any unproved conjecture, is quite mistaken. Provided it is made clear which are proved facts and which are conjectures, no harm can result. Conjectures are of great importance since they suggest useful lines of research." (A.M. Turing, 1950). http://www.abelard.org/turpap/turpap.php View in LinkedIn
Read More
linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:24:49

linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:24:49

Uncategorized
CONSCIOUSNESS VS INTELLIGENCE. “The Turing Test wasn't designed as the goal of AI. It was designed as a thought experiment to explain to people who were very skeptical, at the time, that the possibility of intelligent machines did not depend on achieving consciousness — that you could have a machine you'd have to agree was behaving intelligently because it was behaving indistinguishably from a human being.” http://www.techinsider.io/artificial-intelligence-machine-consciousness-expert-stuart-russell-future-ai-2015-7 View in LinkedIn
Read More
linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:27:49

linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:27:49

Uncategorized
NOT MAINSTREAM. “Almost nobody in AI is working on passing the Turing Test, except maybe as a hobby. There are people who do work on passing the Turing Test in various competitions, but I wouldn't describe that as mainstream AI research.” http://www.techinsider.io/artificial-intelligence-machine-consciousness-expert-stuart-russell-future-ai-2015-7 View in LinkedIn
Read More
linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:28:50

linkedin post 2020-03-13 06:28:50

Uncategorized
MISUNDERSTOOD. “I think the media often gets it wrong. They assume that everyone in AI is trying to pass the Turing Test, and nobody is. They assume that that's the definition of AI, and that wasn't even what it was for.” http://www.techinsider.io/artificial-intelligence-machine-consciousness-expert-stuart-russell-future-ai-2015-7 View in LinkedIn
Read More