NO BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE. “Such an objection could not so easily be made against artificial parthenogenesis. It was a change in the mode of production (or reproduction), an improvement upon nature in that it eliminated an unnecessary element (the sperm), and offered the possibility of replacing half the sea urchin population with a mixture of salts.”
https://lnkd.in/eQf5Evv
linkedin post 2022-06-29 05:12:48
Nigel Fleming
September 21, 2022