linkedin post 2016-11-07 06:57:20

Uncategorized
STRATA DISRUPTION. "Why did not natural selection, acting on entities at the lower level (replicating molecules, free-living prokaryotes, asexual protists, single cells, individual organisms) not disrupt integration at the higher level (chromosomes, eukaryotic cells, sexual species, multicellular organisms, societies)?" https://lnkd.in/eZ5-m7K View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-11-06 05:30:59

Uncategorized
SO ENDS the first week on the human foot. Nothing is as it seems to be. We usually marvel at nature's inventiveness, with good reason. But no living morsel under the sun has been purpose-built. All are transitional morphs borrowed from previous inventions, after aeons of tinkering for new functions. All are morphs in restless transitions, destination unknown, with a thousand blind ends, and a few startling successes. View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-11-09 06:43:19

Uncategorized
CENTRAL CONTROL. "If a 'selfish' mutation occurs in a chromosomal gene, a suppressor mutation at any other locus in the genome would be favoured by selection. Hence the rest of the genome may win the contest, not because of any analogue of majority voting, but because of the large number of loci, and hence of possible suppressor mutations, that are available for each selfish mutation." https://lnkd.in/eZ5-m7K View in LinkedIn
Read More

linkedin post 2016-11-08 05:23:06

Uncategorized
CONTINGENT IRREVERSIBILITY EXAMPLE 7. "The reversion from sex to parthenogenesis. Amniote vertebrates, although they may be parthenogens, always require sperm from males of another species to initiate development, perhaps because the sperm provides a centriole." https://lnkd.in/eZ5-m7K View in LinkedIn
Read More